Nancy Pelosi's Words, redirected.

I took Nancy Pelosi's comments on the selection of Governor Sarah Palin (10 years executive experience), and redirected it at a more important candidate for a more important office, who has even less experience:

Nancy Pelosi on the Importance of the Lack of Experience of Barack Obama:

"The selection of a presidential candidate is one of the most significant and telling decisions a political party can make.

The Democratic Party selection of Barack Obama raises serious questions about their judgment. Why, when the country is fighting two wars, facing an uncertain economy and an energy crisis, did the DNC make the choice that they did?

Why, with so many other qualified women and men in their party, did the Democrats choose Barack Obama? Barack Obama is not the right choice. He shares the Far Lest's commitment to murdering the unborn and continuing The Pelosi-Reid failed economic policies.

Barack Obama and Joe Biden will not bring the American people the New Direction they need."

Simple fact is, Biden has NEVER been about change or a new direction. Biden is part of the old-old guard of democrats, who were in charge in the 70s and 80s, who gave us the Carter malaise, double-digit inflation, a stagnant stock market, and a prolonged cold war.

And Obama has done NOTHING to change the direction of the failed liberal policies still clung to by the current leadership of Pelosi and Harry Reid. He has sponsored virtually no interesting legislation, and has to take credit for bills he had nothing to do with and didn't even VOTE for in order to have any resume whatsoever.

Meanwhile, McCain has a long history of standing up for principle, against his own party. Many time he was wrong to do so, in my opinion, but McCain is about a new direction, a more ethical approach. And Sarah Palin is the ultimate outsider -- only one Governor is further physically from Washington, and few have shown the commitment to take on corruption even in their own party as Palin.

Obama and Biden have zero years of experience being in charge of anything. Palin was an executive for 10 years, a governor for nearly two years, was the co-owner of a successful business, and had a career as a journalist. Obama was a community organizer who used questionable ties to gain a position in the state senate where he accomplished nothing (his campaign claimed 3 achievements in his years of service, two of which he had nothing to do with).

Palin respects life -- Obama thinks babies are a burden he doesn't want for his children. Palin supports the 2nd amendment, Obama thinks citizens can't be trusted with weapons. Palin knows "global warming" is a political construct, Obama uses it to steal liberty from the people.

In a Presidential race between Obama and Palin, Palin would be the more experienced executive, and the better leader. Obama has never lead anything -- even his campaign is run by others, and he tags along (remember his complaint that he wanted to visit all the states but his campaign only let him visit "57"?).

McCain chose wisely when he chose Palin. She isn't the most experienced Republican, but she matches McCain well, and is well-qualified to be 2nd in line for the Presidency.

When the Democrats claim otherwise, just remember -- not only did they pick a less-experienced person for hte TOP of their ticket, when they had to pick the Majority leader, 3rd in line for the President, they picked Nancy Pelosi, who isn't qualified to run anything.